to, 2017-10-05 kello 00:08 +0200, Ilhan Polat kirjoitti: [clip] > 2. Feature completeness of basic modules.
I think those judgments can be subjective, but it is true many things have been organically grown, and this becomes even more so as the number of contributors grows (fielding other people's PRs already takes a lot of time). I think most people send something that they need there and then, and it is not possible to tell them to go do something else instead. So even if there are many contributors, it's less clear how available they are for implementing "the plan". Regardless, I would recommend anyone who knows something obvious is missing that obviously should be included, to send a PR adding it to the roadmap: https://github.com/scipy/scipy/blob/master/doc/ROADMAP.rst.txt This document has not really been updated significantly since the single brainstorm in a Scipy conference many years ago, and we did not go through the contents then in great detail. Pauli _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
