On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 8:24 AM, Pauli Virtanen <p...@iki.fi> wrote: > to, 2017-10-05 kello 00:08 +0200, Ilhan Polat kirjoitti: > [clip] > > 2. Feature completeness of basic modules. > > I think those judgments can be subjective, but it is true many things > have been organically grown, and this becomes even more so as the > number of contributors grows (fielding other people's PRs already takes > a lot of time). I think most people send something that they need there > and then, and it is not possible to tell them to go do something else > instead. So even if there are many contributors, it's less clear how > available they are for implementing "the plan". > > Regardless, I would recommend anyone who knows something obvious is > missing that obviously should be included, to send a PR adding it to > the roadmap: > > https://github.com/scipy/scipy/blob/master/doc/ROADMAP.rst.txt > > This document has not really been updated significantly since the > single brainstorm in a Scipy conference many years ago, and we did not > go through the contents then in great detail. >
I did update it several times, removing things that were implemented or no longer relevant. However you're right that especially on the new features front it could use more inputs. Ralf > Pauli > > _______________________________________________ > SciPy-Dev mailing list > scipy-...@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
