<snip> > Incidentally, once we make reduce/accumuate/... into "associated gufuncs", I > propose completely removing the "method" argument of __array_ufunc__, since > it is no longer needed and adds a lot > of complexity which implementors of an __array_ufunc__ are forced to > account for.
For Quantity at least I found it somewhat helpful to have the method separate from the ufunc, as how one deals with it still has similarities. Though it would probably have been similarly easy if `__array_ufunc__` had been passed `np.add.reduce` directly. Aside: am not sure we can so easily remove `method` any more, but I guess we can at least start getting to a state where it always is `__call__`. Anyway, this does argue we should be rather careful with signatures.. In particular, for `__array_function__` we really need to think carefully about `types` - an `__array_function__` specific dict at the end may be more useful. All the best, Marten _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
