OK, I am can give you a few more days. I'll be camping through the weekend, but hope to accept it when I get back on Monday!
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 1:07 AM Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: > I'm sorry, I've been trying to find the time to read what you ended up > with, and haven't managed yet – could I get a few days extension? :-) > > -n > > On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 5:27 PM, Stephan Hoyer <sho...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I propose to accept NEP-18, "A dispatch mechanism for NumPy’s high level > > array functions": > > http://www.numpy.org/neps/nep-0018-array-function-protocol.html > > > > Since the last round of discussion, we added a new section on "Callable > > objects generated at runtime" clarifying that to handle such objects is > out > > of scope for the initial proposal in the NEP. > > > > If there are no substantive objections within 7 days from this email, > then > > the NEP will be accepted; see NEP 0 for more details. > > > > Cheers, > > Stpehan > > > > _______________________________________________ > > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > > NumPy-Discussion@python.org > > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > > > > > > -- > Nathaniel J. Smith -- https://vorpus.org > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
