+1 Jarrod
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 9:30 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:02 PM, Charles R Harris <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:45 PM, Peter Creasey >> <p.e.creasey...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>> >>> +1 for keeping the same CoC as Scipy, making a new thing just seems a >>> bigger surface area to maintain. Personally I already assumed Scipy's >>> "honour[ing] diversity in..." did not imply any protection of >>> behaviours that violate the CoC *itself*, but if you wanted to be >>> really explicit you could add "to the extent that these do not >>> conflict with this code of conduct." to that line. >> >> >> I prefer that to the proposed modification, short and sweet. > > > This edit to the SciPy CoC has now been merged. > > It looks to me like we're good to go here and take over the SciPy CoC. > > Cheers, > Ralf > > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
