On Tue, 2018-08-14 at 21:30 -0700, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:02 PM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:45 PM, Peter Creasey < > > p.e.creasey...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > +1 for keeping the same CoC as Scipy, making a new thing just > > > seems a > > > bigger surface area to maintain. Personally I already assumed > > > Scipy's > > > "honour[ing] diversity in..." did not imply any protection of > > > behaviours that violate the CoC *itself*, but if you wanted to be > > > really explicit you could add "to the extent that these do not > > > conflict with this code of conduct." to that line. > > > > I prefer that to the proposed modification, short and sweet. > > > > This edit to the SciPy CoC has now been merged. > > It looks to me like we're good to go here and take over the SciPy > CoC.
Sounds good, so +1. I am happy with the committee as well, and I guess most/all are, but we might want to discuss it separately? - Sebastian > > Cheers, > Ralf > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
