On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 7:20 AM Marten van Kerkwijk < m.h.vankerkw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree that we should not have two functions > > I also am rather unsure whether a ufunc is a good idea. Earlier, while > discussing other possible additions, like `erf`, the conclusion seemed to > be that in numpy we should just cover whatever is in the C standard. This > suggests `sinc` should not be a ufunc. > That standard is for "what special functions we include in numpy, regardless of implementation", not "which special functions we already have in numpy should be implemented as ufuncs or regular functions". -- Robert Kern
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
