Unfortunately, I couldn't get this patch to work, and my time has run
out.  Maybe someone with more knowledge the precedences/order of
functions during linking can take a look.  I don't know how to tell
the system BLAS to call our custom xerbla, instead of the one
provided.

The patch addresses an important issue, though, so it warrants some
more attention.

Regards
Stéfan

On 09/04/2008, Stéfan van der Walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm busy working on this one.  Can't get the patch working as
>  advertised, yet, so I'm wondering if lapack_lite is preferring some
>  other xerbla over the one provided.
>
>
>  On 09/04/2008, Jarrod Millman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > This has a patch:
>  >  http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/numpy/ticket/673
>  >
>  >  Could someone review, comment or commit?
>  >
>  >  Thanks,
>
_______________________________________________
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Reply via email to