On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Charles R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 12:25 AM, Jarrod Millman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 11:25 PM, Charles R Harris >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 12:10 AM, Charles R Harris >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> The python 2.6 buildbots are showing 5 failures that are being hidden >> by >> >> valgrind. >> > >> > They seem to have fixed themselves, they were probably related to the >> API >> > addition I made, then moved. However, it is a bad thing that the errors >> were >> > covered up by Valgrind and not reported. >> >> I didn't understand what you meant by this yesterday, but I see what >> you are talking about now: >> >> http://buildbot.scipy.org/builders/Linux_x86_64_Fedora/builds/486/steps/shell_2/logs/stdio >> >> http://buildbot.scipy.org/builders/Linux_x86_Fedora_Py2.6/builds/461/steps/shell_2/logs/stdio >> >> You said they fixed themselves, but the failures are in the most >> recent buildbot reports. This is the only thing I am concerned about >> before branching, so hopefully someone can look at this and let me >> know whether the failures are indeed fixed. >> > > That's actually a bit different, I saw the 5 failures after the main > sequence of tests and those are OK now. Valgrind seems to run things twice > and the new failures are in the valgrind tests, I missed those. > I take that back, I got confused looking through the output. The errors are the same and only seem to happen when valgrind runs the tests. Chuck
_______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
