On Tuesday 15 July 2008 07:30:09 Francesc Alted wrote: > Maybe is only that. But by using the term 'frequency' I tend to think > that you are expecting to have one entry (observation) in your array > for each time 'tick' since time start. OTOH, the term 'resolution' > doesn't have this implication, and only states the precision of the > timestamp.
OK, now I get it. > I don't know whether my impression is true or not, but after reading > about your TimeSeries package, I'm still thinking that this expectation > of one observation per 'tick' was what driven you to choose > the 'frequency' name. Well, we do require a "one point per tick" for some operations, such as conversion from one frequency to another, but only for TimeSeries. A Date Array doesn't have to be regularly spaced. _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
