Peter Saffrey wrote: > > I've found that if I just cut nans from the list and use regular numpy median, > it is quicker - 10 times slower than list median, rather than 35 times slower. > Could you just wire nanmedian to do it this way?
Unfortunately, we can't, because we would loose generality: we need to compute median on any axis, not only the last one. The proper solution would be to have a sort/max/min/etc... which knows about nan in numpy, which is what Chuck and I are working on ATM, cheers, David _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
