josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Alan G Isaac <ais...@american.edu> wrote: >> On 6/4/2009 1:27 PM josef.p...@gmail.com apparently wrote: >>> Note: there are two versions of the docs for np.intersect1d, the >>> currently published docs which describe the actual behavior (for the >>> non-unique case), and the new docs on the doc editor >>> http://docs.scipy.org/numpy/docs/numpy.lib.arraysetops.intersect1d/ >>> that describe the "intended" usage of the functions, which also >>> corresponds closer to the original source docstring >>> (http://docs.scipy.org/numpy/docs/numpy.lib.arraysetops.intersect1d/?revision=-227 >>> ). that's my interpretation >> >> Again, the distributed docs do *not* describe the actual >> behavior for the non-unique case. E.g., >> >>>>> np.intersect1d([1,1,2,3,3,4], [1,4]) >> array([1, 1, 3, 4]) >> >> Might this is a better example of >> failure than the one in the doc editor? > > Thanks, that's a very clear example of a wrong answer, > and it removes the question whether the function makes any sense for > the non-unique case. > I changed the example in the doc editor to this one. > > It will hopefully merged with the source at the next update.
Thank you Josef! r. _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
