On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Charles R Harris <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > I don't feel that numpy/scipy did as well in GSOC 2009 as it could have. I > think this was mostly due to lack of preparation on our part, we weren't > ready when the students started showing up on the lists. So I would like to > put together a selection of suitable projects and corresponding mentors that > we could put on the wiki somewhere and advertise. Just to start things off, > here are two things that come to mind. > > Python 3k transition. I think it is time to start looking at this seriously. > Best of breed special functions in cython. These could be part of a separate > numpy extras package where code is restricted to C, Cython, and Python. > > Thoughts?
for scipy: more stats, gsoc2009 went very well. Josef > > Chuck > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > > _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
