On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 1:11 PM, <josef.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Charles R Harris > <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I don't feel that numpy/scipy did as well in GSOC 2009 as it could have. > I > > think this was mostly due to lack of preparation on our part, we weren't > > ready when the students started showing up on the lists. So I would like > to > > put together a selection of suitable projects and corresponding mentors > that > > we could put on the wiki somewhere and advertise. Just to start things > off, > > here are two things that come to mind. > > > > Python 3k transition. I think it is time to start looking at this > seriously. > > Best of breed special functions in cython. These could be part of a > separate > > numpy extras package where code is restricted to C, Cython, and Python. > > > > Thoughts? > > for scipy: more stats, gsoc2009 went very well. > > Yes, it seems so. I had the impression that planning for that project was undertaken pretty early on with the involvement of Skipper. What exactly *was* the history of that project and what can we learn from it?
Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
