On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Matthew Brett <matthew.br...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > >>> Is it reasonable to summarize that, to avoid confusion, we keep >>> 'matrix_rank' as the name? >>> >>> I've edited as Robert suggested, attempting to adopt a more suitable >>> tone in the docstring... > >> What comes next when someone offers up a useful function like this? >> We are using an earlier version of in statsmodels and wouldn't mind >> seeing this in numpy. Presumably the doctests should be turned into >> actual tests (noting Robert's comment) to make it more likely that it >> gets in and an enhancement ticket should be filed? > > I'm happy to write the doctests as tests. My feeling is there is no > objection to this function at the moment, so it would be reasonable, > unless I hear otherwise, to commit to SVN. >
Sounds good. I didn't know you had commit privileges, and I didn't want to see this get lost in the shuffle. Skipper _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
