Hi, On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Gael Varoquaux <gael.varoqu...@normalesup.org> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 02:13:08PM -0500, Matthew Brett wrote: >> I'm happy to write the doctests as tests. My feeling is there is no >> objection to this function at the moment, so it would be reasonable, >> unless I hear otherwise, to commit to SVN. > > I have one small comment: I am really happy to see you working on this > function. It will be very useful, and its great to have it in a > generaly-available package. However, I wonder whether it belongs to > numpy.linalg, or scipy.linalg. I was under the impression that we should > direct users who have linalg problems to scipy, as it can do much more.
It's another option, and one I thought of, but in this case, the use is so ubiquitous in linear algebra, and the function so small, that it would seem a pity to require installing scipy to get it. See you, Matthew _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
