On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 2:29 AM, David Warde-Farley <d...@cs.toronto.edu> wrote: > On 5-Jan-10, at 7:02 PM, Christopher Barker wrote: > >>> Pretty sure the python.org binaries are 32-bit only. I still think >>> it's sensible to prefer the >> >> waiting the rest of this sentence.. ;-) > > I had meant to say 'sensible to prefer the Python.org version' though > in reality I'm a little miffed that Python.org isn't providing Ron's 4- > way binaries, since he went to the trouble of adding support for > building them. Grumble grumble.
My understanding was that 2.6/3.1 will never be buildable as an arch selectable universal binary interpreter (like the apple system python) due to this issue: http://bugs.python.org/issue6834 I think this is only being fixed in 2.7/3.2 so perhaps from then Python will distribute selectable universal builds. (Just mention it in case folks aren't aware of that issue). Cheers Robin _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
