On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:48 AM, David Cournapeau <courn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Marsh <patrickmars...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Okay, I'm about out of ideas. Hopefully someone on here has an idea as > to > > what might be going on. > > 1. I am still unable to build the windows superpack using pavement.py, > even > > after making sure I have all the necessary dependencies. However, the > good > > news is that pavement.py now recognizes where the Atlas binaries David > > provided are located. The output from "paver bdist_wininst" is located > > here http://patricktmarsh.com/numpy/20100302.paveout.txt. > > That's a bug in the pavement script - on windows 7, some env variables > are necessary to run python correctly, which were not necessary for > windows < 7. I will fix this. > Thanks! > > > 2. Since I couldn't get pavement.py to work, I decided to try and build > > Numpy with sse3 support using "python25 setup.py build -c mingw32 > > bdist_wininst > buildout.txt". (Note, I've also done this for building > with > > Python 2.6.) > > You should make sure that you are testing the numpy you think you are > testing, and always, always remove the previous installed version. The > matrix error is most likely due to some stalled files from a previous > install > > David > Okay, I had been removing the build and dist directories but didn't realize I needed to remove the numpy directory in the site-packages directory. Deleting this last directory fixed the "matrix" issues and I'm now left with the two failures. The latter failure doesn't seem to really be an issue to me and the first one is the same error that Ralf posted earlier - so for Python 2.5, I've got it working. However, Python 2.6.4 still freezes on the test suite. I'll have to look more into this today, but for reference, has anyone successfully built Numpy from the 1.4.x branch, on Windows 7, using Python 2.6.4? I'm going to attempt to get my hands on a Windows XP box today and try to build it there, but I don't know when/if I'll be able to get the XP box. Thanks for the help ====================================================================== FAIL: test_special_values (test_umath_complex.TestClog) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Python25\Lib\site-packages\numpy\core\tests\test_umath_complex.py", line 179, in test_special_values assert_almost_equal(np.log(x), y) File "C:\Python25\Lib\site-packages\numpy\testing\utils.py", line 437, in assert_almost_equal "DESIRED: %s\n" % (str(actual), str(desired))) AssertionError: Items are not equal: ACTUAL: [ NaN+2.35619449j] DESIRED: (1.#INF+2.35619449019j) ====================================================================== FAIL: test_doctests (test_polynomial.TestDocs) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Python25\Lib\site-packages\numpy\lib\tests\test_polynomial.py", line 90, in test_doctests return rundocs() File "C:\Python25\Lib\site-packages\numpy\testing\utils.py", line 953, in rundocs raise AssertionError("Some doctests failed:\n%s" % "\n".join(msg)) AssertionError: Some doctests failed: ********************************************************************** File "C:\Python25\lib\site-packages\numpy\lib\tests\test_polynomial.py", line 20, in test_polynomial Failed example: print poly1d([100e-90, 1.234567e-9j+3, -1234.999e8]) Expected: 2 1e-88 x + (3 + 1.235e-09j) x - 1.235e+11 Got: 2 1e-088 x + (3 + 1.235e-009j) x - 1.235e+011 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ran 2334 tests in 10.175s FAILED (KNOWNFAIL=7, SKIP=1, failures=2) Patrick -- Patrick Marsh Ph.D. Student / NSSL Liaison to the HWT School of Meteorology / University of Oklahoma Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies National Severe Storms Laboratory http://www.patricktmarsh.com
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
