Numpy 1.4.0 svn rev 8270 builds (with setup.py) and tests OK on Windows 7 using Python 2.6.4. The only test failure is test_special_values (test_umath_complex.TestClog).
- Christoph On 3/3/2010 7:22 AM, Patrick Marsh wrote: > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:48 AM, David Cournapeau <courn...@gmail.com > <mailto:courn...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Marsh > <patrickmars...@gmail.com <mailto:patrickmars...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > Okay, I'm about out of ideas. Hopefully someone on here has an > idea as to > > what might be going on. > > 1. I am still unable to build the windows superpack using > pavement.py, even > > after making sure I have all the necessary dependencies. However, > the good > > news is that pavement.py now recognizes where the Atlas binaries David > > provided are located. The output from "paver bdist_wininst" is > located > > here http://patricktmarsh.com/numpy/20100302.paveout.txt. > > That's a bug in the pavement script - on windows 7, some env variables > are necessary to run python correctly, which were not necessary for > windows < 7. I will fix this. > > > > Thanks! > > > > 2. Since I couldn't get pavement.py to work, I decided to try and > build > > Numpy with sse3 support using "python25 setup.py build -c mingw32 > > bdist_wininst > buildout.txt". (Note, I've also done this for > building with > > Python 2.6.) > > You should make sure that you are testing the numpy you think you are > testing, and always, always remove the previous installed version. The > matrix error is most likely due to some stalled files from a previous > install > > David > > > Okay, I had been removing the build and dist directories but didn't > realize I needed to remove the numpy directory in the site-packages > directory. Deleting this last directory fixed the "matrix" issues and > I'm now left with the two failures. The latter failure doesn't seem to > really be an issue to me and the first one is the same error that Ralf > posted earlier - so for Python 2.5, I've got it working. However, > Python 2.6.4 still freezes on the test suite. I'll have to look more > into this today, but for reference, has anyone successfully built Numpy > from the 1.4.x branch, on Windows 7, using Python 2.6.4? I'm going to > attempt to get my hands on a Windows XP box today and try to build it > there, but I don't know when/if I'll be able to get the XP box. > > Thanks for the help > > > ====================================================================== > FAIL: test_special_values (test_umath_complex.TestClog) > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Traceback (most recent call last): > File > "C:\Python25\Lib\site-packages\numpy\core\tests\test_umath_complex.py", > line 179, in test_special_values > assert_almost_equal(np.log(x), y) > File "C:\Python25\Lib\site-packages\numpy\testing\utils.py", line > 437, in assert_almost_equal > "DESIRED: %s\n" % (str(actual), str(desired))) > AssertionError: Items are not equal: > ACTUAL: [ NaN+2.35619449j] > DESIRED: (1.#INF+2.35619449019j) > > > ====================================================================== > FAIL: test_doctests (test_polynomial.TestDocs) > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Traceback (most recent call last): > File > "C:\Python25\Lib\site-packages\numpy\lib\tests\test_polynomial.py", > line 90, in test_doctests > return rundocs() > File "C:\Python25\Lib\site-packages\numpy\testing\utils.py", line > 953, in rundocs > raise AssertionError("Some doctests failed:\n%s" % "\n".join(msg)) > AssertionError: Some doctests failed: > ********************************************************************** > File "C:\Python25\lib\site-packages\numpy\lib\tests\test_polynomial.py", > line 20, in test_polynomial > Failed example: > print poly1d([100e-90, 1.234567e-9j+3, -1234.999e8]) > Expected: > 2 > 1e-88 x + (3 + 1.235e-09j) x - 1.235e+11 > Got: > 2 > 1e-088 x + (3 + 1.235e-009j) x - 1.235e+011 > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Ran 2334 tests in 10.175s > > FAILED (KNOWNFAIL=7, SKIP=1, failures=2) > > > Patrick > -- _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
