2010/3/30 Andrea Gavana <andrea.gav...@gmail.com>: > However, from the first 100 or so interpolated simulations, I could > gather these findings: > > 1) Interpolations on *cumulative* productions on oil and gas are > extremely good, with a maximum range of relative error of -3% / +2%: > most of them (95% more or less) show errors < 1%, but for few of them > I get the aforementioned range of errors in the interpolations; > 2) Interpolations on oil and gas *rates* (time dependent), I usually > get a -5% / +3% error per timestep, which is very good for my > purposes. I still need to check these values but the first set of > results were very promising; > 3) Interpolations on gas injection (cumulative and rate) are a bit > more shaky (15% error more or less), but this is essentially due to a > particular complex behaviour of the reservoir simulator when it needs > to decide (based on user input) if the gas is going to be re-injected, > sold, used as excess gas and a few more; I am not that worried about > this issue for the moment.
Have a nice time in Greece, and what you write makes me laughing. :-) When you are back, you should maybe elaborate a bit on what gas injections, wells, re-injected gas and so on is, I don't know about it. Friedrich _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion