Hi, > It seems to me that git's flexibility in how people collaborate means > we can do a certain amount of figuring out after the switch.
This is very well said and true to our recent experience with nipy and ipython: http://github.com/ipython/ipython http://github.com/nipy/nipy > My > experience with a small project has been that anyone who wants to make > major changes just clones the repository on github and makes the > changes; then we email the main author to ask him to pull particular > branches into the main repo. It works well enough. That's the model we've gone for in nipy and ipython too. We wrote it up in a workflow doc project. Here are the example docs giving the git workflow for ipython: https://cirl.berkeley.edu/mb312/gitwash/ and in particular: https://cirl.berkeley.edu/mb312/gitwash/development_workflow.html Cheers, Matthew _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
