On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 6:11 PM, David Goldsmith <d.l.goldsm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 3:03 PM, <josef.p...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 5:56 PM, David Goldsmith >> <d.l.goldsm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Something is systematically wrong if there are this many problems in the >> > numpy.stats docstrings: numpy is supposed to be (was) almost completely >> > ready for review; please focus on scipy unless/until the reason why >> > there >> > are now so many problems in numpy.stats can be determined (I suspect the >> > numpy.stats code has been made to call the scipy.stats.distributions >> > module, >> > and all those docstrings have been marked "Unimportant" - meaning do not >> > edit - either permanently, in the case of the instances, or temporarily >> > in >> > the case of the base classes from which the instances are created). >> > >> > Bottom line: if it doesn't start w/ scipy, leave it alone (for now). >> >> It's missing in several functions and incorrect docstrings have to be >> corrected. Look at the log of e.g. pareto in the editor, the returns >> have never been added, unless you find any missing revisions that are >> not in the doc editor. >> >> Josef > > OK, I see it was promoted to "Needs review" very early in the first Marathon > - before the Standard had been finalized? God help us: how many other numpy > docstrings are improperly at "Needs review" because of this? Scheisse, > numpy may not be as close to Ready For Review as we thought...
Is there a chance that some changes got lost? I thought I had edited random.pareto to note that it is actually Lomax or Pareto II. But I'm not completely sure I actually did it, and not just intended to do it. I don't see any record in the doc editor, so maybe I never did edit it. Josef > > DG > > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > > _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion