On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Jason McCampbell
<jmccampb...@enthought.com>wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:07 PM, Charles R Harris <
> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi Jason,
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Jason McCampbell <
>> jmccampb...@enthought.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Chuck (and anyone else interested),
>>>
>>> I updated the refactoring page on the NumPy developer wiki (seems to be
>>> down or I'd paste in the link).  It certainly isn't complete, but there are
>>> a lot more details about the data structures and memory handling and an
>>> outline of some additional topics that needs to be filled in.
>>>
>>>
>> I note that there are some C++ style comments in the code which will cause
>> errors on some platforms, so I hope you are planning on removing them at
>> some point. Also,
>>
>
> Mostly the C++ comments are there for specific things we need to fix before
> it's complete (easier to search for).  Likely a few are attributable to
> "muscle memory" in my fingers as well, but all will be removed as we button
> it up.
>
>
>>
>> if (yes) foo;
>>
>> is very bad style. There is a lot of that in old code like that that still
>> needs to be cleaned up, but I also see some in the new code. It would be
>> best to get it right to start with.
>>
>
> Agreed.  In the code I have edited I typically re-write it as "if (NULL !=
> yes) foo;" but a lot of code has been copied in wholesale and we haven't
> always updated that code.
>
>

I mean it is bad style to have foo on the same line as the if. I think this
happens because folks start off wanting to save a bit of vertical space and
a couple of keystrokes, but in the long run it tends to make the code harder
to read.

Chuck
_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Reply via email to