On 10/29/11 5:02 PM, Olivier Delalleau wrote: > I haven't been following the discussion closely, but wouldn't it be instead: > a.mask[0:2] = True? > > It's something that I actually find a bit difficult to get right in the > current numpy.ma <http://numpy.ma> implementation: I would find more > intuitive to have True for "valid" data, and False for invalid / missing > / ... I realize how the implementation makes sense (and is appropriate > given that the name is "mask"), but I just thought I'd point this out... > even if it's just me ;)
Just a thought: what if this also worked: a.mask[0:2]=np.NA as a synonym for a.mask[0:2]=True? Would that be less confusing, and/or would it be less powerful or extensible in important ways? Thanks, Jason Grout _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
