> Message: 4 > Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:25:21 -0700 > From: Matthew Brett <matthew.br...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64bit infrastructure > To: Discussion of Numerical Python <numpy-discussion@scipy.org> > Message-ID: > <CAH6Pt5qa27Zb+UkOZB5EzsLK5UuoB-f8UcwFjdL2YcEBRZ=w...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Hi, > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Sayth Renshaw <flebber.c...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Sayth, >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Sayth Renshaw <flebber.c...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> I was just wondering if the current absence of 64bit builds was as a result >>>> of an infrastructure or funding concern. >>>> >>>> I like many now have only 64 bit systems and am using the unofficial >>>> builds. >>>> >>>> If it was something we could raise funds to resolve, how much? Or is it >>>> more >>>> complex than that? >>> >>> Which platform, windows? >>> >>> Ondrej >>> >>> >> >> Yes I have a Windows 7 64Bit install and a ubuntu 64 Bit install. > > Isn't the numpy ubuntu install 64 bit by default? > > You may have seen that there are numpy and scipy 64-bit windows installers > here: > > http://www.lfd.uci.edu/~gohlke/pythonlibs/ > > Do they work for you? > > Best, > > Matthew > > > ------------------------------ >
Thanks Matthew yeah that's the one I am currently using and it is working ok but just thought if there was a way to help 64bit builds become official then I would ask. Sayth _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion