On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Matthew Brett <matthew.br...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > >> Can we defer the Scipy build until after the Numpy build? > > > > > > That doesn't sound like a good idea to me. > > I must say I'm a little confused as to how we're going to make the > decisions here. > How about: attempt to reach consensus? David's concern on DLLs hasn't been addressed yet, nor has mine on packages being unavailable. I was actually still answering another of your emails, but I can't seem to reply fast enough. > > I'm sure you agree that there's an opposite argument to be made, and I > would make it if I thought it would make a difference, but I'm losing > faith in my ability to keep the discussion on track, and I don't know > what to do about that. > I don't see the problem. Before you offered to put in work. Ondrej is willing to help, so is Christoph. So why is it impossible to do Scipy builds? I can see us getting to a solution here, but offering Numpy installers without Scipy ones is not a solution in my book. Ralf
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
