> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Alan G Isaac > <alan.is...@gmail.com> wrote: >> For + and * (and thus `dot`), this will "fix" something that is not broken. >> It is in fact in conformance with a large literature on boolean arrays >> and boolean matrices.
On 12/6/2013 3:24 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > Interesting point! I had assumed that dot() just upcast! But what do > you think about the inconsistency between sum() and dot() on bool > arrays? I don't like the behavior of sum on bool arrays. (I.e., automatic upcasting.) But I do not suggest changing it, as much code is likely to depend on it. Cheers, Alan _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion