Hi, On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Pauli Virtanen <p...@iki.fi> wrote: > 23.02.2014 00:03, Nathaniel Smith kirjoitti: >> Currently numpy's 'dot' acts a bit weird for ndim>2 or ndim<1. In >> practice this doesn't usually matter much, because these are very >> rarely used. But, I would like to nail down the behaviour so we can >> say something precise in the matrix multiplication PEP. > > I'm not sure it's necessary to say much about this in the PEP. It should > in my view concentrate on arguing why the new binop is needed in the > Python language, and for that, restricting to 2D is good enough IMHO.
Yes, I was thinking the same. Best, Matthew _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
