On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Fernando Perez <fperez....@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Aron Ahmadia <a...@ahmadia.net> wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 7:53 AM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: >>> >>> The thread so far, it sounds like the consensus answer is "meh, >>> whatever". So I'm thinking we should just drop @@ from the PEP, and if >>> it turns out that this is a problem we can always revisit it in the >>> ~3.6/3.7 timeframe. >> >> >> +1 from here. > > > +1 too. Absent *clear* enthusiasm and support for new syntax/operators, I > think being conservative and slow is the right approach. Just having @ will > give us data and experience with this space, and it may become clear after > one more cycle that we really need/want @@, or not, as the case may be. But > it's easier to add it later if we really need it than to remove it if it > proves to be a bad idea, so +1 for moving slowly on this.
+1. Thanks Nathan for pushing this! Ondrej _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
