On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Sankarshan Mudkavi <smudk...@uwaterloo.ca>wrote:
> > I've written a rather rudimentary NEP, (lacking in technical details which > I will hopefully add after some further discussion and receiving > clarification/help on this thread). > > Please let me know how to proceed and what you think should be added to > the current proposal (attached to this mail). > > Here is a rendered version of the same: > > https://github.com/Sankarshan-Mudkavi/numpy/blob/Enhance-datetime64/doc/neps/datetime-improvement-proposal.rst > I've done a bit of copy-editing, and added some more from this discussion. See the pull request on gitHub. There are a fair number of rough edges, but I think we have a consensus among the small group of folks that participated in this discussion anyway, so now "all" we need is someone to actually fix the code. If someone steps up, then we should also go in and add a bunch of unit tests, as discussed in this thread. -CHB -- Christopher Barker, Ph.D. Oceanographer Emergency Response Division NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception chris.bar...@noaa.gov
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion