On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Charles R Harris < charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Might want to take a look at the datetime > proposal<https://github.com/ContinuumIO/blaze/blob/master/docs/design/blaze-datetime.md>for > blaze. > oh man! not again!. Oh well, that is a decidedly different proposal -- maybe better, I don't know. But it's different enough that I think we should pretty much ignore it for now, and still do a few fixes to make the current datetime64 usable. Maybe as that gets mature, we could adopt it, or something like it, to numpy. Or maybe we'll all be using Blaze then anyway ;-) But thanks for the ping... -CHB > <snip> > > Chuck > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > > -- Christopher Barker, Ph.D. Oceanographer Emergency Response Division NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception chris.bar...@noaa.gov
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
