On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote:
> On Apr 6, 2015 2:01 PM, "Ralf Gommers" <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > There are too many PRs marked as "1.10 blockers", I think the only real > blockers are: > > - __numpy_ufunc__ PRs (#4815, #4855) > > The main blocker here is figuring out how to coordinate __numpy_ufunc__ > and __binop__ dispatch, e.g. PR #5748. We need to either resolve this or > disable __numpy_ufunc__ for another release (which would suck). > > This needs some careful attention, so it'd be great if people could take a > look. > > > - sgemv segfault workaround (#5237) > > - fix for alignment issue (#5656) > I think #5316 is the alignment fix. > Agreed on these. > > > - resolving the debate on diagonal (#5407) > > Not really a blocker IMHO -- if we release 1.10 with the same settings as > 1.9, then no harm will be done. (I guess some docs might be slightly off.) > And IMO that's the proper resolution for the moment anyway :-). > Asked for this to be reopened anyway, as it was closed by accident. Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
