On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Matthew Brett <matthew.br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Did you see any remark made by me or Stefan or anyone else that could > reasonably be described as bizarre, surprising or disheartening? > As I said already, I wasn't referring to you personally, but to the tone of the thread. It was the taste that the thread left in my mouth after reading tens of very long emails, and I guess I wasn't the only one, since multiple folks used such adjectives. But it was a poor choice of words on my part. And no, I didn't make a quote-by-quote analysis of the thread, I'm sorry. One last time, it was *not* a personal reference to you: the only reason I mentioned your names was because of the Berkeley clarification regarding BIDS that I asked of Travis, that's all. If that comment hadn't been made, I would not have made any mention whatsoever of anyone in particular. I apologize for not foreseeing that this would have made you feel singled out, in retrospect, I should have. In my mind, it was the opposite, as I felt that you had every right to express whatever opinions you have speaking for yourselves, independent of your affiliations, and I was simply asking Travis to separate individuals from institutions. But I should have realized that calling anyone out by name in a context like this is a bad idea regardless. Cheers, f -- Fernando Perez (@fperez_org; http://fperez.org) fperez.net-at-gmail: mailing lists only (I ignore this when swamped!) fernando.perez-at-berkeley: contact me here for any direct mail
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
