Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: > Thanks Chuck! It looks like it's just wording tweaks / clarifications > at this point, so nothing we need to discuss in detail on the list. If > anyone wants to watch the sausage being made, then the link is above > :-), and we'll continue the discussion in the PR unless anything > substantive comes up.
Anyone has a veto? That reminds me of something that happened in the senate of Rome; they only had a small number of vetoers, sometimes only one or two, and even that caused havoc. I think it should be better clarified how much contribution is needed before someone can be considered to have veto rights. It would e.g. be ridiculous if I were to begin and veto stuff, as my contributions are minute... OMG. Sturla _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
