There is the concept of consensus-driven development, which centers on veto rights. It does assume that all actors are driven by a common goal to improve the project. For example, the fact that we didn't have consensus back during the whole NA brouhaha was actually a good thing because IMHO including NA into NumPy would have hurt the community more than it would have helped.
Ben Root On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Sturla Molden <sturla.mol...@gmail.com> wrote: > Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: > > > Are you planning to go around vetoing things > > I don't consider myself qualified. > > > for ridiculous reasons and causing havoc? > > That would be unpolite. > > > And if not, then who is it that you're worried about? > > I am not sure :) > > I just envisioned a Roman patron shouting veto or a US senator > filibustering. Expulsion would be the appropriate recation, yes :-) > > > Sturla > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
