On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Charles R Harris <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > The failed tests require pyrex, fortran, and swig. The refcount error > comes and goes, probably the test isn't very good. Ralf, is there any > reason to keep the various extension building tests? They are very old. >
There are f2py tests that are useful - if they fail then building anything else with f2py fails as well. However those are all in f2py/tests/ IRRC, not in distutils/tests. > > I don't know what the recommendation on using nosetests is, > Don't use it (it definitely gives test errors due to not having the knownfailure plugin), use either runtests.py or numpy.test(). > but probably it is finding too many tests. > It's doing its job here in finding these though. It looks like these tests need either fixing (the extensions aren't built) or removing. I'll have a look tonight. Ralf
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
