Charles Lepple wrote: > Wow, that was quick... Thanks! (It was taking me a while to sort out > all of the different CFLAGS settings; hence, the tracker item.) > > I would take issue with the following assertion in Makefile.am: > > "In any case, CFLAGS are only -I options, so there is no harm." > > since this is what got us into trouble in the first place... but I > guess that was there before you edited it as well.
Yeah. I considered adding some words that adding CFLAGS may not be as harmless as stated above. Maybe later. > Here's the mess of flags from Net-SNMP on openSUSE, some of which seem > to change the API somewhat: > > "-DNETSNMP_ENABLE_IPV6 -O2 -march=i586 -mtune=i686 -fmessage-length=0 > -Wall -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector -g -fno-strict-aliasing > -fstack-protector-all -Ulinux -Dlinux=linux -I/usr/include/rpm > -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -DTHREADS_HAVE_PIDS -DDEBUGGING > -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wdeclaration-after-statement > -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 > -I/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i586-linux-thread-multi/CORE -I. > -I/usr/include" That's indeed quite a bit and sure is worthy of leaving out if SNMP support is not needed (or broken). > At any rate, things seem to be working. Thanks again. Do you think it is safe to backport r1296 and r1297 to Testing as well? Best regards, Arjen _______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
