On Feb 12, 2008 1:10 PM, Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Once upon a time, Charles Lepple <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > On Feb 12, 2008 9:46 AM, Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > While the ser_get_line_alert() call above isn't really doing anything > > > (the alert handler just throws away the input) does have a wait that is > > > longer than the ser_flush_io() call, so I don't know if that will > > > function the same. > > > > > > I have not yet had a chance to try it on my old UPS (since I have to > > > copy updates to my notebook and carry it to the power room). > > > > OK. When you get a chance, let me know the order that works, and we > > can commit it. > > I tried replacing the ser_get_line_alert() call with ser_flush_io(), and > I was not getting all the responses that the execute() function should > see, so I guess I would just leave that alone (use just the patch I sent > before).
Committed to the trunk as r1299. -- - Charles Lepple _______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
