On May 19, 2008, at 6:27 PM, David Mathog wrote: > No idea why it thinks it is a Liebert.
It's only looking at the USB vendor ID, and the only Liebert USB UPS that we heard about had that vendor ID. (Then again, these may be completely different beasts - that UPS had product ID 0xffff, and yours is 0x0003.) Here's the entry from http://www.linux-usb.org/usb.ids : 06da Phoenixtec Power Co., Ltd 0002 UPS Maybe the base driver should be named Phoenixtec instead. > % /usr/local/ups/bin/usbhid-ups -a MarusonTop -x productid=0003 > Network UPS Tools: 0.29 USB communication driver - core 0.33 (2.2.2) > > No matching HID UPS found This could be a permissions problem. (There is no easy way to look at all the USB HID devices if we do not have write access to them, and the default NUT configuration uses an unprivileged userid to communicate with the UPS.) For now, you can run something like 'chmod a+w /dev/bus/usb/003/010' but that isn't very secure, and the last part of the path will change every time you unplug the UPS. You can also change scripts/udev/nut.rules.in to include a line for your UPS (search for LIEBERT). Then, run ./config.status, and it will regenerate nut.rules. Installation instructions are in scripts/udev/ README. -- Charles Lepple [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list Nut-upsdev@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev