Citeren Alexander Gordeev <[email protected]>:
Could you do the same, but now at debug level 3 (-DDD). I would like
to see the raw dump of the report descriptor too, to see where the
error is. My guess is that there is something wrong with the
contents of the report descriptor, that might allocate too little
room for the reports.
Sure, attached it.
Bad news, the report descriptor is badly broken for the reports I
mentioned (and a couple of others too). This needs to be fixed by
Powercom, we can't do anything about that. Note that it is extremely
unlikely that the Logical Minimum and Logical Maximum values for the
battery voltage are 100 and 230 respectively.
It looks like the person who wrote this, did copy-and-paste a couple
of reports and forgot to change them to the final values. The fact that
UPS.PowerSummary.Voltage
UPS.Battery.Voltage
UPS.Input.Voltage
UPS.Output.Voltage
all report a value of '212' is a tell tale sign for this. Could it be
that you have a prototype model? And that the final firmware is still
being developed? If not, Powercom seems to have a serious problem.
Best regards, Arjen
--
Please keep list traffic on the list
_______________________________________________
Nut-upsdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
