Dear All, Kindly please work out in detail your questions. Sincerely yours -- Alexey Morozov distribution manager
-----Original Message----- From: Arjen de Korte [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 12:33 AM To: Alexander Gordeev Cc: [email protected]; Morozov Alexey Subject: Re: [Nut-upsdev] Powercom support and sponsorship Citeren Alexander Gordeev <[email protected]>: >> Could you do the same, but now at debug level 3 (-DDD). I would like >> to see the raw dump of the report descriptor too, to see where the >> error is. My guess is that there is something wrong with the contents >> of the report descriptor, that might allocate too little room for the >> reports. > > Sure, attached it. Bad news, the report descriptor is badly broken for the reports I mentioned (and a couple of others too). This needs to be fixed by Powercom, we can't do anything about that. Note that it is extremely unlikely that the Logical Minimum and Logical Maximum values for the battery voltage are 100 and 230 respectively. It looks like the person who wrote this, did copy-and-paste a couple of reports and forgot to change them to the final values. The fact that UPS.PowerSummary.Voltage UPS.Battery.Voltage UPS.Input.Voltage UPS.Output.Voltage all report a value of '212' is a tell tale sign for this. Could it be that you have a prototype model? And that the final firmware is still being developed? If not, Powercom seems to have a serious problem. Best regards, Arjen -- Please keep list traffic on the list _______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
