On Monday, 2 August 2021 02:40:21 CEST, David Kačerek wrote: > [...] But It's not ideal, as I see it, there are 2 bugs to be > reported: 1 bug reported to openSUSE to fix their nut.sh script within > their nut package 2. bug reported to the NUT upstream to implement the so > called "inhibitor interface" mentioned in the systemd-sleep man page so > this nut.sh workaround wouldn't have to exist at all. However I'm not sure > it they accept such a solution because of its ties to systemd. There are > some Linux distros like Gentoo with their OpenRC init system or maybe other > distros still sticking to SysVInit...
Bug reported to openSUSE: https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi? id=1188990 And another one upstream: https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/1070 David K. _______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list Nut-upsuser@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser