On Monday, 2 August 2021 02:40:21 CEST, David Kačerek wrote:
> [...] But It's not ideal, as I see it, there are 2 bugs to be
> reported: 1 bug reported to openSUSE to fix their nut.sh script within
> their nut package 2. bug reported to the NUT upstream to implement the so
> called "inhibitor interface" mentioned in the systemd-sleep man page so
> this nut.sh workaround wouldn't have to exist at all. However I'm not sure
> it they accept such a solution because of its ties to systemd. There are
> some Linux distros like Gentoo with their OpenRC init system or maybe other
> distros still sticking to SysVInit...

Bug reported to openSUSE: https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?
id=1188990

And another one upstream: https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/1070

David K.





_______________________________________________
Nut-upsuser mailing list
Nut-upsuser@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser

Reply via email to