On Tuesday, 3 August 2021 00:05:26 CEST, David Kačerek wrote: > On Monday, 2 August 2021 02:40:21 CEST, David Kačerek wrote: > > [...] But It's not ideal, as I see it, there are 2 bugs to be > > reported: 1 bug reported to openSUSE to fix their nut.sh script within > > their nut package 2. bug reported to the NUT upstream to implement the so > > called "inhibitor interface" mentioned in the systemd-sleep man page so > > this nut.sh workaround wouldn't have to exist at all. However I'm not sure > > it they accept such a solution because of its ties to systemd. There are > > some Linux distros like Gentoo with their OpenRC init system or maybe > > other > > distros still sticking to SysVInit... > > Bug reported to openSUSE: https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi? > id=1188990 > > And another one upstream: https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/1070
openSUSE bug report here: https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1188990 ...wordwrapping in my e-mail client broke the 1st link. David K. _______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list Nut-upsuser@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
