Yes, but he said "2.0.5" in the subject line. -- Peter Arjen de Korte wrote: > > Peter Selinger wrote: > > > If I understood Markus correctly, the problem is not that the data > > goes stale (it should do that when disconnecting the UPS > > communications line), but that it goes unstale immediately afterwards > > (even when the UPS is still disconnected). > > That's entirely possible if he's using a version older than 2.0.4. > That's why I asked him which version he's using. > > > This shouldn't really happen. Maybe some debugging is needed. > > Maybe, but in that case I would still like to know the version, in order > to interpret the output in the right way. We've applied some bugfixes in > this aspect, especially in the code that decides whether a UPS is stale > or not. > > > Markus: the function that decides whether your UPS is stale or not is > > server/sstate.c:sstate_dead(). Perhaps you can insert some debugging > > statements to figure out what this function returns and why. > > If sstate_dead() is the problem, I'm almost certain that Markus is using > something older than 2.0.4. In that case he'd better update to something > newer. > > Best regards, Arjen >
_______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser