Peter Selinger wrote: > If I understood Markus correctly, the problem is not that the data > goes stale (it should do that when disconnecting the UPS > communications line), but that it goes unstale immediately afterwards > (even when the UPS is still disconnected). > > This shouldn't really happen. Maybe some debugging is needed. > > Markus: the function that decides whether your UPS is stale or not is > server/sstate.c:sstate_dead(). Perhaps you can insert some debugging > statements to figure out what this function returns and why.
In retrospect, that is a good idea. We've seen more problems in the past with this (repetitive stale/not stale reports from upsd), so we'd better put this in the code ourselves. Markus, could you checkout the latest code from the SVN trunk and run upsd with -DDDDD to see what is happening? Best regards, Arjen _______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser