Arnaud Quette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >I am not certain I understood this explanation correctly. Is hald, then,
> >going to replace the top two levels (upsd and upsmon) of the present
> >nut architecture?
>
> exactly, or about. hald will only replace upsd (data servicing)
> gnome-power-manager (or alike) take over the upsmon role. Though I
> don't like that.
> I would rather prefer a generic daemonized "upsmon" role, leaving only
> the GUI (notification / configuration) to g-p-m and alike...
Interesting, in view of a basic question I was planning to ask here.
Watch for my next post.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
_______________________________________________
Nut-upsuser mailing list
Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
