On Aug 18, 2015, at 9:07 PM, Johnny Wong <e430ben...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> Is it possible that there is another copy of the driver running in the >> background? There is apparently an issue where we only write a PID file when >> the driver goes into the background, and "-D" prevents that. > > I don't see another usbhid-ups running ... unless its "hidden".... I would > have to install the unhide package then.... >
What I mean is that you can't have more than one usbhid-ups process talking to the same UPS at one time - regardless of whether they write a PID file. In the case of running with "-D", you would need to double-check for any in the background (and there was a PID file named usbhid-ups-upstl1300.pid). "ps auxww|grep [u]sbhid-ups" should show only one driver in either case. Still looking into the altsetting issue. I would have to shuffle a few machines around to get a copy of 10.2 running on a box that isn't being actively used for anything else, but maybe there is something in their source control logs. -- Charles Lepple clepple@gmail _______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
