[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12500133
 ] 

Chris A. Mattmann commented on NUTCH-444:
-----------------------------------------

Hi Guys,

 Okay, here is the way that I currently see this issue, and what to do with 
this. There are three options:

1. keep parse-rss and parse-feed (worst, but still doable)
2. gut parse-rss with new code from parse-feed (probably the best choice)
3. blow away parse-rss and create new plugin in sources called parse-feed (also 
a good choice)

  So, the plan I am going to do is:

if(parse-feed contains a superset of the functionality of parse-rss){
  choose option 2
}
else{
   choose option 3 if and only if parse-feed is equivalent to parse-rss
   choose option 1 otherwise
}

 I've been lagging on this. I'll make some progress on getting a patch ready 
this week. 

> Possibly use a different library to parse RSS feed for improved performance 
> and compatibility
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NUTCH-444
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-444
>             Project: Nutch
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: fetcher
>    Affects Versions: 0.9.0
>            Reporter: Renaud Richardet
>            Assignee: Chris A. Mattmann
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.0.0
>
>         Attachments: feed.tar.bz2, NUTCH-444.patch, parse-feed-v2.tar.bz2, 
> parse-feed.tar.bz2
>
>
> As discussed by Nutch Newbie, Gal, and Chris on NUTCH-443, the current 
> library (feedparser) has the following issues:
> - OutOfMemory when parsing > 100k feeds, since it has to convert the feed to 
> jdom first
> - no support for Atom 1.0
> - there has been no development in the last year
> Alternatives are:
> - Rome 
> - Informa
> - custom implementation based on Stax
> - ??

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to