Hello, 

sounds good.  one question is we have taged release-0.9, and this release has 
been there in some mirror sites of nutch, and people downloaded this version, 
so there would be two nutch-0.9 exist in the world, how could people differ 
between them. 

Thanks
David 

Chris Mattmann :
> Folks,
>
>  Discussing this with Andrzej, and reading his email below, I tend to agree
> more with this procedure below. I would like to call for a vote to change
> the existing as-documented procedure (on the wiki) to branch first, do
> testing in  branch (apply patches where needed), and then when the branch
> is blessed (e.g., 3 binding votes from committers in favor of it), tag it,
> and make a release. Sound good?
>
>  In terms of next steps with what we have now, that boils down to:
>
> 1. delete tags/release-0.9
> 2. apply patch to trunk
> 3. create branches/branch-0.9
> 4. have dennis test again (large scale)
> 5. if all goes well, finish release process
> 6. tag tags/release-0.9
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Cheers,
>   Chris
>
> On 3/28/07 10:35 AM, "Andrzej Bialecki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dennis Kubes wrote:
> >> Yes.  This seems to have fixed the problem.  All, do we want to create a
> >> JIRA and commit this for the 0.9 release?
> >
> > It should definitely go into the release, and we need a patch for the
> > trunk/ .
> >
> > Actually, I'm somewhat surprised that we have tags/release-0.9 but we
> > don't yet have branches/branch-0.9 ...
> >
> > I think I'm confused, or the release procedure is confused. My
> > understanding so far was that we first create a branch-0.9, we test the
> > build from that branch and if it passes all tests and the wait period is
> > over, then we copy it to tags/release-0.9 and proclaim a release - which
> > is really a read-only branch, i.e. we don't ever commit any patches to
> > it ... If that were the case, then we still wouldn't have the
> > release-0.9 tag, we could have applied the patch in branch-0.9, plus
> > possibly other patches, and then finally tag this tree as
> > tags/release-0.9.
> >
> > As it is now we are in an awkward situation that we have to patch
> > tags/release-0.9 ..
> >
> > One solution would be now to delete this tag, apply the patch to trunk,
> > create branches/branch-0.9, and continue applying any other patches that
> > may come up during this testing period - and when we are finally happy
> > with the codebase then take a snapshot into tags/release-0.9, and keep
> > it read-only.
> >
> > Another solution is to bend the rules and apply the patch to trunk/ and
> > then merge from the trunk to tags/release-0.9 .
> >
> > What do you think?

-- 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Nutch-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nutch-developers

Reply via email to