Sami Siren wrote: >> > The branch should have been done when we kind fixed >> > the features for 0.9. not when the first rc is cut. >> >> That's the past for me. We're discussing how we should modify the >> procedure to get the best results in the future, given the team and the >> momentum we have now. > > > I think we're discussing about the same thing(improving the process), I > just don't think 0.9 is out yet :) > > > But to wrap it up for me: > > +1 for creating 0.9 branch after fixing the bug (and removing the tag), > creating new rc > and starting a vote.
+1. > I still propose that we discuss a bit more (in a separate thread) before > rewriting the how to release > page in wiki. I agree - the current release process didn't fare too well in this particular situation ... -- Best regards, Andrzej Bialecki <>< ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________ [__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web ___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Nutch-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nutch-developers
